For what it’s worth… I tend to ‘refund' academia’s research luxuries (time/mind 
space as resource) as a duty to release free software… many do too. I know it 
is not ideal but at least it brings some cool toys (like Pd ;-)



> On 12 Nov 2018, at 03:16, Alexandre Torres Porres <por...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:por...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> There was recently a bounty for GEM developing, it started picking up, 
> everyone agreed it was a cool idea, I never used GEM in my life and I chipped 
> in 15 US$... the thing is that then there was a discussion on wether to move 
> to a different bounty system and the whole thing kinda died away.
> 
> So all I have to say is that I don't think there's an issue for Pd people, 
> and my only issue is that I hope my pennies do not go to waste :) 
> 
> Em dom, 11 de nov de 2018 às 21:10, Julian Brooks <jbee...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:jbee...@gmail.com>> escreveu:
> Hi all,
> 
> Can I ask our community what's the general take on bounties?
> 
> I've discussed this informally with a couple of people on here (not on-list) 
> and it's a polarising topic.
> 
> For me, free/open is doomed unless we accept that current/traditional methods 
> of practise serve as a form of serfdom - or require a hefty dose of 
> institutional/employer support (& often community participation - which is 
> great obvs.).
> 
> It's not sustainable for free software to carry on reliant on free labour 
> (IMO).
> 
> I've always liked something that Michel Bauwens (p2p foundation) once said 
> (roughly paraphrased), that copyleft can only be implemented once the 
> revolution is complete, and until then we require to get paid (somewhere 
> along the line).
> 
> There are enough crappy things out there that are purely extractive, without 
> replicating such political/economic hardships within my own favoured 
> idealised/idealistic communities.
> 
> This though, isn't to say I don't get the argument that it's a dangerous line 
> to cross, with projects becoming solely an economic arms race, highly 
> centralised, with reimagined methodologies and rules for participation.
> 
> It's a tricky one. 
> 
> All input and insight appreciated...
> 
> Best to all,
> 
> Julian
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list 
> <https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list 
> <https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to