On 3/1/19 2:00 AM, Fede Camara Halac wrote:
> ok. i think you can discard my last email. It turns out i was loading the old 
> 32bit i had.  my bad. 
> 
> but 
> 
> i did some more digging and the reason pd does not load the externals is that 
> they dont exist. 

so?
your original error was when loading pix_opencv.pd_darwin.
most likely, pix_opencv is single binary with multiple objects (or put
otherwise: ther isn't a pix_rgba.pd_darwin either)

> somehow the only object built is pix_opencv.pd_darwin, which just fires a 
> console welcome message. The rest of the pix_opencv_*.pd_darwin objects are 
> not created. Only their *.o are there and they *can* be used to make their 
> respective ps_darwins (tried with one and worked, loaded and all :)
> 
> First, I dont know why this last step of the linking is just not happening. 
> How can I make sure this is not something missing from the generated Makefile?
> 
> Second, I dont fully understand these makefiles. Can this all be done easier 
> with pd-lib-builder? I am tempted to try and do something like that.
> 

i don't know the pix_opencv makefile, but pd-lib-builder is not really
targetted at complex build systems with lots of dependencies.


fgmadsr
IOhannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to