On 3/12/2019 6:11 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > TL:DR: better use a modular JACK (freewheel) approach compared to more > 'static' Pd as a plugin approach.
For more than a decade I've been totally happy with pdvst~. Having the ability to integrate Pd to a DAW channel has been totally productive to my music. Also integration of automation parameters from the DAW to the patch is very valuable. I guess is totally possible to do a pdladspa~ (or any other open source audio plug-in protocol). As far as I know Pdvst~ is just Pd running an "external scheduler". Is not that I have anything against your "JACK (freewheel)" approach, just sharing some thought. :) Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
