> if you want to use pd~ to for example render a GEM patch you need to > switch on dsp in the subprocess at least for a moment.
I don't think you need to do this (anymore). Control objects work fine without DSP being turned on in the subprocess, like the documentation says. @iftah, some more ideas: * make sure DSP is turned on in the parent process (even if the subprocess doesn't process audio) * make that the subprocess could really load the patch (verify with the GUI) * in the subprocess, send a message to [stdout] with [loadbang] and check if you receive it in the parent process * send a message to the subprocess and check if it is properly received, e.g. by sending it back to [stdout] Christof > Gesendet: Montag, 16. September 2019 um 12:35 Uhr > Von: "Max" <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [PD] pd~ and rpi > > I remember this bug. > if you want to use pd~ to for example render a GEM patch you need to > switch on dsp in the subprocess at least for a moment. A simple > > > [loadbang] > | > [; > pd dsp 1( > > > [loadbang] > | > [delay 1000] > | > [; > pd dsp 0( > > > in the subprocess will make it work. > I'm not sure if or when this was fixed, but I think it was at some point. > > > > On 15.09.19 18:57, iftah gabbai wrote: > > hello list, its my first email ever so i really hope i do the guidelines > > justice, i just missed the part about the gmail issue so chaned my > > adress to @googlemail , apologies if u got this email twice :) > > > > i tried searching the list and google and couldn’t find too much info so > > i try here: im attempting to use (pd~) in a patch in order to use > > multicore processing on my rpi 3b+. it works fine on my mac using pd > > 0.50 but does not seem to work on my rpi running strech lite headless > > and pd 0.47. the closest i got is to get it to print info out of stdout > > and this is happening only when i start the dsp in the sub process which > > kinda contradicts the documantaion. i tested also using atest patch > > which is just an osc~ connected to a dac~ in the sub process but still > > no luck. i wonder if anyone ever got this to work? is it related to 0.47 > > and should i go thru the trouble of compiling / installing a newer > > version since 0.47 is the latest version available for strech lite as > > far as i understated? > > > > thank you very much > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
