> you're right in case of this specific object since this external I was only talking about this special case where the folder has the same name as the object. I just wanted to dispute the notion that [declare -lib hid] behaves different than plain [hid] in respect to search paths.
Christof > Gesendet: Montag, 07. Oktober 2019 um 15:45 Uhr > Von: "oliver" <oli...@klingt.org> > An: "Christof Ressi" <christof.re...@gmx.at> > Betreff: Re: [PD] declare not posting library loading message while object > creation does? > > > > > >>> i guess Peter was saying that he only loads libraries/externals > >> explicitly when they are needed. > > > > I don't get it. When I do [hid] - without [declare -lib] -, it will be > > exactly loaded when needed. > > > > Christof > > > > you're right in case of this specific object since this external > consists of only one object which is synonymous with the folder it > resides in. > > but let's take for example an object like [pmenu] from the TOF library > (without any startup search paths): > > 1.) [pmenu] -> can't be found > 2.) [tof/pmenu] -> will be loaded > 3.) [pmenu] with [declare -path tof] -> will be loaded > > best > > oliver > _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
