Em sáb., 18 de jan. de 2020 às 12:49, oliver <[email protected]> escreveu:
> João Pais wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > I didn't try clone yet, I always worked with dynamic patching for > > similar issues. For those who are knowledgeable, I would like to ask: is > > there any advantage of clone against dynamic patching when using the > > same circuit, or is it the same? > > This pertains to patches working on both control and signal input/output. > > > > if you are familiar with MAX: > > [clone] is nearly the same as [poly~] > > one feature badly missing is the possibility ta allocate dynamic "voice" > (or "instance") numbers (i.e. how many instances of an abstraction are > created). i hope miller has plans to implement this in the future. right now, all you can do is a combination of using [clone] and dynamic > patching if you want to change the number of instances on the fly > (destroy the old clone object and re-create it with new arguments with > PD messages). > Yeah, that's a nice feature to have, why don't you open a request on github? https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
