Just wondering how cpu intensive the samplerate~ object is? Is it just receiving from a value inside of pd, or does it need to retrieve directly from hardware every time?
We've been running into issues with [loadbang] to samplerate~ and having the rate change after our loadbangs, so were considering using [bang~]. Would that be reasonable, even if we might have to do it a few hundred times?
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
