Em seg., 4 de mai. de 2020 às 15:20, Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> escreveu:
> That's exactly how the big analog consoles do it. well, that changes things :) > Or maybe there is a > decay, but a much quicker one, whereas for the peak there is a even a > short hold time. > sorry, "a even a short hold time"? You can't have proper peak detection using [env~]. It will always > calculate an rms value. > Sure, hence it's a variation, which takes into account the peak, not RMS. My idea was in fact to propose this as a second output for [env~] but anyway, seems [slop~] is doing the trick now and that what I thought was bad was actually how things work, so all I can say is that we could make a better/proper example on how to feed both RMS and peak into [vu]
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
