I guess making noise on the list helps :) it narrows down to someone also feel it's worth it and implement it, aren't you a skilled fellow anyway? I think this one is over my head... I'm still only able to managing lower hanging fruits :P
Em sex., 5 de jun. de 2020 às 15:30, baptiste chatel < [email protected]> escreveu: > Is there a way to nicely "upvote" this request other than commenting the > issue ? > > Le ven. 5 juin 2020 à 20:16, Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> I already made that request by the way >> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/500 >> >> Em sex., 5 de jun. de 2020 às 14:51, baptiste chatel < >> [email protected]> escreveu: >> >>> Would it be possible to have a [clone] option that allows clones >>> individual signal inlets/outlets to be exposed ? >>> >>> An example : i need to make 64 of the following patch : >>> [receive~ thing-$1] >>> | >>> [outlet~] >>> that should go to a matrix, $1 in [1:64]. >>> >>> [clone] is useless because it will sum all outputs and expose only one, >>> since the cloned patch has one output. >>> >>> I could do it with dynamic patching, but as practical as it could be, it >>> is pretty convoluted to use for such a simple need. >>> >>> >>> Baptiste >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >>> >>
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
