michael horgan has a project

https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~mhorgan/220c/

"I am a little disappointed with the latency issue involving the large block 
sizes necessary for the yin~ object."

> On Jul 12, 2020, at 12:27 PM, katja <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Jaime do you refer to [helmholtz~]
> (www.katjaas.nl/helmholtz/helmholtz.html)? This uses a time domain
> method, but based on normalized autocorrelation whereas yin uses
> differences if I remember well.
> 
> On 7/12/20, Jaime Oliver <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Katja Vetter has a similar one.
>> Best,
>> J
>> 
>> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, 11:18 AM Vinicius Cesar
>> <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi everybody,
>>> 
>>> Does anyone know if there's any implementation of yin algorithm for
>>> fundamental frequency estimation in PD?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Akk the best,
>>> 
>>> Vinicius
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> [email protected] mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to