Thanks, Miller. Yes, it seems that is the case. I attach an example that shows the delayed block(s).
What do you mean inefficient? I do not see a drastic change in cpu usage on the very basic adc-to-dac example subprocess I include here. As a side note, I noticed that loading -fifo 0 seems to crash pd ! Best, ffdd On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 5:42 PM Miller Puckette <[email protected]> wrote: > That _should_ be correct. > > fifos less than 2 are probably inefficient (but I dn't know that for > sure). > > cheers > Miller > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 06:37:42PM -0300, Fede Camara Halac wrote: > > ???Hi, > > > > When using pd~ with -fifo 1, do you get a delay of 1 block like in > throw/catch scenario? > > > > Thanks! > > > > fd > > > > fdch.github.io > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list__;!!Mih3wA!Uyv-HqXmCoj0l9209QG7_r5nfJVd8i8hyj0jSDRm6FzZv6t-9DKLtwT6Zaba$ > -- fdch.github.io
<<attachment: pd-tilde-block-test.zip>>
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
