Em ter., 9 de fev. de 2021 às 12:18, Pierre Guillot < [email protected]> escreveu:
> > not sure what you mean, are you saying we should forget about your > abandoned work and just stick to the version from ceammc? Or are you saying > I could ask them for help on what needs to be done so it compiles? > > Not necessarily "forget" as the Hoa library is part of the CEAMMC library. > If you just want to "resurrect" the Hoa library exactly as it was 4 years > ago, I'm afraid that you will spend a lot of time for not many benefit > because most of the Hoa objects and patches are already available via the > CEAMMC library. So, it would be simpler to help the CEAMMC devs to finish > the integration of the Hoa library into the CEAMMC library. But, of course, > it depends on what you want to do and how you want to do it > That's all very nice to know. I only have two speakers and I know next to nothing about ambisonics. I'm not a real user of this or any other ambisonics library and I have no idea about the state and issues of HOA. I also have no idea what's been modified and what's going on inside CEAMMC. But anyway, lots of information has been spread here and that's great! I had the idea one could just get 'hoa' from deken without having to get all of ceammc or use their fork. Not that I have anything against ceammc integrating it (and, for what I know now, actually "saving" and "resurrecting" hoa), it's just that sometimes people want one specific thing (in this case a dedicated ambisonics library) and would rather not carry more than they needed. And ceammc as a library carries lots of stuff on their own and also encompasses/includes other third party libraries (such as hoa, cream, chaos and more stuff). In a more critical sense, there's no 'ceammc' for any linux distribution in deken... So if there weren't so many issues that are now clear, I could see the point and advantage of "resurrecting" hoa and bringing it to deken for all platforms (including raspberry pis). - to be honest if I had the time there is a high probability that I > recreate a new spatialization library from scratch just to have fun to > explore new approaches, so I'm really not the right person to tell what to > do and how to do it ;). > that'd be nice, the more the merrier :) Pd could use more ambisonics objects. This is why I felt it was necessary to upload CICM-Tools to deken! cheers
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
