On Tue, 2021-05-25 at 12:41 -0300, Esteban Viveros wrote: > > > About the point 2. It is addressed to open the scope of feedbacks. I > think that the effort to create a new standard for documentation > should cover as many opinions as possible at first (like this > one). It's like a brainstorm. Then we will try to systematize and > organize the material we have in order to constitute a form that > satisfies everyone as much as possible with easy maintenance, open to > collaborations.
While what you says makes sense in my eyes, I'm curious to know what triggered you to start this effort. I'm asking because I would like to understand what different notions of "good documentation" are. Personally, I like the self-contained nature of Pd with almost no external dependencies. I'd welcome if this quality is considered while evaluating documentation improvements. Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
