Am 8. Juni 2021 17:05:13 MESZ schrieb Miller Puckette via Pd-list
<pd-list@lists.iem.at>:
>P.S. maybe 'sendto' would be clearer - 'to' could be misunderstood as
>just setting
>a return port/addr for a later 'send' (which I think would make
>netreceive -u
>unnecessarily stateful).
i think 'sendto' only makes sense as [sendto example.com 6000 10 20(
that is: specifying both target and data in a single message (as the name is so
close to 'send').
I think this is what you want to do anyhow.
I wonder about efficiency though: each 'sendto' would trigger a host lookup,
which is probably cached by the OS, but even so might still be rather costy.
mfg.fsd.sgj
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
