On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 15:28 +0100, Peter P. wrote:
> * Roman Haefeli <reduz...@gmail.com> [2022-01-12 15:08]:
> > Hey all
> >
> > Using callbacks is certainly interesting for low-latency
> > applications.
> > I noticed that JACK allows blocksizes below 64, namely 32 and 16.
> > However, those can only be used with callbacks disabled which means
> > having to use an additional buffer again.
> >
> > I wonder if the blocksize of 64 is deeply baked into Pd or if it
> > could
> > theoretically be made configurable.
> Sorry, I didn't check this myself, but can {block~] be used in a
> top-level patch perhaps?According to the documentation, [dac~ ]/[adc~] cannot reside in re- blocked (sub)patches. There is no mentioning of top-level patches. However, my point was to allow to connect pd to jack running at bs=32 or bs=16 _with_ callbacks. Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
