On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 22:39 +0200, Christof Ressi wrote:
> On 27.03.2022 18:22, Christof Ressi wrote:
> > I guess you should be able to do [3 3( -> [text get] to get the
> > second 
> > sublist, but [3 4( -> [text get] should probably trigger an 
> > out-of-range error.
> 
> I meant to write [0 3 3( -> [text get] and [0 3 4( -> [text get]...
> 
> Another side note: it would be nice if a negative field count for
> [text 
> get] would output all fields up to the next seperator (comma or
> semi). 

I agree and it does so already.

Roman

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to