Em qua., 27 de abr. de 2022 às 11:54, Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> escreveu:
> Isn't a low steepness in the filter in the feedback loop desired > anyway? Me thinks a low steepness means the change in timbre happens > more slowly which - I imagine - would sound nicer than a sudden > 'tziewhh'. Interesting discussion. The suddenty depends on the cutoff frequency as well, and also on the decay/feedback parameter. I guess my problem with the lop~ (a single 1-pole) like filter is that it doesn't work well for higher frequencies. Perhaps a 1-pole and 1-zero filter is better as we need a proper zero at nyquist. The original 2 sample average filter in the KP algorithm is actually just that, a single 0 at nyquist, but it's only a quite high cut filter and you can't set a proper cutoff frequency. I guess I have to test and see how different does it sound and how more efficient it is. I already just broke my pluck~ object for a better design maybe I'll also change the default filter inside. cheers
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
