Em sex., 25 de nov. de 2022 às 22:13, Dan Wilcox <[email protected]> escreveu:
> I do agree with IOhannes to avoid the blue text sine it mimics text > selection coloring. > That's been fixed a few commits ago already :) Thanks for the answer. It's funny, it seems people feel that the format from extended (that I also kinda use Cyclone/ELSE) is the best way to go... but there are some cases where things don't fit, like [expr]. I mentioned its case in L2ork... well, a reference for [expr] can't really explain much and there's also another problem I reported 4 years ago and wasn't fixed yet... asking for [expr~]'s help gives you a help file only for [expr]. I now see they do have a separate file for [expr~] and [fexpr~] but it doesn't get called. Also, there are other 4 separate files for helping with details in expr you can open, like "functions", "arrays". That's 7 in total! I like how only one file takes care of it all in Vanilla :) I was able to also make a single and short subpatch reference and there's a more detailed and complete reference as html. It seems people want more a reference than a help patch. So I'm wondering, should that open first and then we have "further examples and details" as a subpatch? Of course someone will hate that :) Maybe one can right click and ask either for help or for 'reference'? Plan now is to also include new reference sections into the manual. Maybe that can be called from the object. Is there a way to also open a patch in Pd from an html file? Brainstorming here :) cheers
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
