Oh, that’s fantastic. Thanks, Cyrille (and William)!
Phil From: Pd-list <[email protected]> on behalf of cyrille henry <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 9:18 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [PD] Shared memory for [pd~] processes Hello Phil, shmem have been develop for this purpose, and it still works great for this purpose... I think you can install it from deken. Cheers C Le 01/02/2023 à 17:56, Phil Stone a écrit : > Hello everyone, > > I’ve converted my old ‘polywavesynth’ to being able to spawn a new [pd~] > process for its voice management, and that’s working really well. I can see > the load spread to other cores for multiple synthesizers, and after working > out some bugs, I’m really happy with this new capability. > > I have another old synthesizer, ‘polygrainsynth’ I’d like to modify > similarly. It has a large array which is displayed (and can be edited) in the > top-level process. The array is used by the individual voices, which would be > in a subprocess. Is there a way to share that array between the parent > process and the sub-[pd~] process? > > I searched the archives and found mention of ‘share-mem’ by Cyrille Henry > back in 2012: > https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2012-11/098714.html > <https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2012-11/098714.html> but I > can’t find any other mention of it. > > Best, > > Phil > > Phil Stone > > Davis, California USA > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
