If possible, I would suggest leaving something from the "old way" as a reference, although it wouldn't be connected by default.
> On Apr 29, 2023, at 9:42 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 16:42:03 -0300 > From: Alexandre Torres Porres <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > To: Patco <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: Miller Puckette <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PD] hardcoded samplerate in audio example > Message-ID: > <CAEAsFmgfTBtWc5sOX6QhNOiC9Xrg_d4Xeto=quycdsrvbgj...@mail.gmail.com > <mailto:CAEAsFmgfTBtWc5sOX6QhNOiC9Xrg_d4Xeto=quycdsrvbgj...@mail.gmail.com>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Now that I actually had a real glimpse, I see that the original patch > expects a message with the sound file name and its sample rate. Indeed this > is an old practice before soundfiler could give you the sample rate, so > this example can be modernized so as to not require the user to specify the > sample rate of the file. Anyway, I already opened an issue and will take > care of this in my docs branch. -------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
