Em qui., 1 de jun. de 2023 às 06:49, Peter P. <[email protected]> escreveu:
> Thanks Cyrille, that's a good hint! I think it should in fact be > [expr~ atan2($v2, $v1)] to work with signal vectors blockwise. > yup, and that's what [else/car2pol~] does, which I had referred to before as a vanilla solution. > Now I am wondering if I should/need to unwrap the phases still... > depends on what you're doing and how you are converting things back to cartesian form (else/pol2car~ is vanilla and doesn't need wrapping). you could use wrap~ and just convert to the range from 0-1 in the input and then resize back on the output. cheers > > cheersz, P > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
