On 3/14/24 17:57, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Em qui., 14 de mar. de 2024 às 11:36, Peter P. <[email protected]> escreveu:is this behavior taken for granted along all message-objects?yes, this is mentioned in the documentation, in the manual, and in the control tutorial (see example 04.messages.pd)
which is good.
Sometimes this is exposed in the help files, as with [line~], but not every time. I guess there are more examples where this can get exposed and reinforced. Math objects, [expr], [makenote].
i'm still very reluctant about adding the same and the same information to every object that just exhibits standard behaviour, as this quickly becomes noise. ("hey, did you know that you can connect this object to [print]?")
i think it makes sense in objects like [line~] where we typically see uses like "[0, 1 1000(". it probably makes also sense to document that [list prepend] will actually *not* distribute the elements to its inlets.
gfmdsar IOhannes
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
