Well, I can't reproduce that here - I tried with 0.54-0, 0.55-0test2c.
and the latest build from CI:
time ~/Desktop/Pd-0.55-0test2c.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd -send "pd quit"
--> 0.03s user 0.08s system 13% cpu 0.854 total
time ~/Applications/Pd-0.54-1.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd -send "pd quit"
--> 0.03s user 0.09s system 13% cpu 0.882 total
time ~/Desktop/Pd-0.55-0test3-21-gb6476e02.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd
-send "pd quit"
--> 0.03s user 0.08s system 12% cpu 0.860 total
I got very little variation in the execution times, except that the
first time in a series of running the same app there was an additional
0.06 sec. (The first time of all that I ran each app it was a bit
slower yet).
This is on an M2 Mac MINI with 8MB memory. My guess is this would be a
faster machine than a Macbook air so these might be consistent with your
0.55 behavior, but not with your (faster) 0.54 results.
Oh - I didn't include any plug-in, just straight Pd distribution.
On 5/27/24 9:58 PM, Benjamin Wesch wrote:
thanks a lot for pointing out 'hyperfine' and for providing this
somewhat self-defeating plugin.
comparing 0.54-1 to the artifact from the iem pipeline for 618b6325
now, i get the results below. side notes:
* the plugin is present in all cases, but should only affect the last
comparison, i assume
* it's a bit irritating to me that quitting 618b63 is slower via
'-send' flag than through the plugin, but this was obviously caused by
outliers (although i got similar results with another 10 runs)
| version | flags | time |
|---------|------------------------|-----------------------|
| 0.54-1 | -nogui -send "pd quit" | 78.5 ms ± 0.6 ms |
| 618b63 | -nogui -send "pd quit" | 77.9 ms ± 1.3 ms |
| | | |
| 0.54-1 | -send "pd quit" | 327.2 ms ± 5.6 ms |
| 618b63 | -send "pd quit" | 2512.9 ms ± 1523.3 ms |
| | | |
| 0.54-1 | | 396.5 ms ± 4.7 ms |
| 618b63 | | 2117.4 ms ± 518.0 ms |
... and a bit of system info:
Model Name: MacBook Air
Model Identifier: Mac14,2
Model Number: MLY33D/A
Chip: Apple M2
Total Number of Cores: 8 (4 performance and 4 efficiency)
Memory: 8 GB
System Version: macOS 14.5 (23F79)
Kernel Version: Darwin 23.5.0
cheers,
ben
Am Mo., 27. Mai 2024 um 15:08 Uhr schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]>:
On 5/27/24 12:15, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
here's what i get on my Debian system using `hyperfine` (which runs the
application multiple times, to cater for disk-caching and whatnot)
| version | flags | time |
|---------|--------|---------------------|
| 0.54-1 | | 131.7 ms ± 21.8 ms |
| 0.54-1 | -nogui | 4.7 ms ± 2.6 ms |
| 618b63 | | 38.4 ms ± 3.6 ms |
| 618b63 | -nogui | 4.1 ms ± 2.3 ms |
[...]
if you want to measure the time until the GUI is fully available, you
probably have to use a GUI plugin that quits Pd from the GUI side.
so i went ahead and created the following GUI-plugin named
"quitter-plugin.tcl":
```tcl
after idle {pdsend "pd quit"}
```
now Pd will quit once the GUI has become "idle" (right after startup).
which gives me the following stats:
| version | time |
|---------|---------------------|
| 0.54-1 | 249.9 ms ± 61.8 ms |
| 618b63 | 202.3 ms ± 119.3 ms |
so you can see, it is much slower than the naive "-send 'pd quit'" test.
Pd-0.55 is still much faster that 0.54-1, at least for me.
gdmfar
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list__;!!Mih3wA!BrjpPIRBDLOWBI5IKVaNaffimG9cFRA9Er4VckakgjoWJpUO9GsdoiG7PLNEasqKByJ9T8okpyYtLnNHVXJs$
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list__;!!Mih3wA!BrjpPIRBDLOWBI5IKVaNaffimG9cFRA9Er4VckakgjoWJpUO9GsdoiG7PLNEasqKByJ9T8okpyYtLnNHVXJs$
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
