Am 9. April 2025 13:07:35 MESZ schrieb Christof Ressi <i...@christofressi.com>: > >In my understanding, a zero-padded signal *must* be filtered, while an >unfiltered ZOH signal may be acceptable for many use cases. Is this correct? >@Miller: Is this maybe also the reason why Pd 0.44 has switched from "pad" to >"hold" as the default upsample method in [inlet~]?
miller already answered why the default method has changed. but here's my reasoning why I picked zero-padding in the original implementation: I wanted the user to be aware that the signal *will* need filtering in most cases. if ZOH is acceptable, it should be a conscious decision, rather than a default, that results in everybody complaining that the Pd's appalling is "somewhat shitty". (so it's one of my dubious pedagogical devices) mfg.sfg.jfd IOhannes --- pd-list@lists.iem.at - the Pure Data mailinglist https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-list@lists.iem.at/message/IIMH434XKDIARLWHLBSKD56AEH7GYTZL/ To unsubscribe send an email to pd-list-le...@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.iem.at/
