Didn't realise my original response went to Arnold (Apologies for the offlist emails).
On 12 March 2017 at 21:35, Arnold Nipper <[email protected]> wrote: > Imho netixlan is more appropriate as this endpoint holds all the > relevant information needed for session setup. > Thanks for the response, that endpoint does look a lot more useful with the exception of the peer name. The output gives the name of the IX itself: [78] => stdClass Object ( [id] => 32817 [net_id] => 976 [ix_id] => 583 [name] => IXManchester [ixlan_id] => 583 [notes] => [speed] => 10000 [asn] => 20860 [ipaddr4] => 195.66.244.2 [ipaddr6] => 2001:7f8:4:2::517c:1 [is_rs_peer] => 1 [created] => 2017-01-26T18:25:22Z [updated] => 2017-01-26T18:25:22Z [status] => ok ) If it had the peers name then this would be the perfect call to use. Thanks, Neil
_______________________________________________ Pdb-tech mailing list [email protected] http://lists.peeringdb.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pdb-tech
