On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 12:07 AM William McBrine <wmcbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Have you not actually tried it? I think it would fully meet your request, > unless I’m misinterpreting you. You do have to use the ACS_* macros (or > equivalent), not the Unicode characters. I think that’s the right thing. > > Only 16 of the ACS_* codes are handled currently (others would be more > complex), but they include all of the box-drawing characters.
Yes, I tried it and it does handle the 16 characters you mentioned really well. I do need the other box drawing and block characters for a couple of applications I'm converting though. Thanks.