> Hey, I was wondering when are we going to change symbol names to
> fit the specs we defined.
>
> Function names are implicated too, right ?
>
> Thus, "pdf_alloc()" would be "pdf_b_alloc ()".
>
> I think that it is better to not put an explicit layer mark in symbol
> names.
>
I'm confused, I thought that was the idea :-/
I considered that it would be too burdensome to put the layer
identification in each symbol defined by the library. I also believe
that to have a unique namespace (i.e. pdf_) will also lead to a better
design by improving the global coherence of the abstractions
implemented in the several layers.
