Hi Gerel. > 1. I just declared "const" those parameters that from a "logical point of > view" > should not be altered in a given procedure according to that procedure > task > and _NOT_ according to its implementation. > > 2. I have decided to not declare "const" those parameter variables passed > to a > "destroy/free" procedure since from a "logical point of view" they're > being > altered, thus destroyed/freed (except for pdf_dealloc() but I'm not > sure).
Sounds ok for me. To use a conceptual approach is The Right Thing(TM) I think. Please install your changes.
