> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:43:53 +0100 > From: Juan Pedro Bolivar Puente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi,
Hi JP :-). > I think that it is still usefull for correct decoupling that the > predictors are implemented as a separate filter. Then, it is the > pdf_stm_filter_install() function who must test for [LZW,Flate]Decode > filters wheter they should be "predicted" first and create the predictor > filter in that case. > > What do you think? Be it implemented in a separate source file or not, as long as the client installing a LZW/flate filter isn't aware of predictors except that it's an additional parameter of the filter, then it's ok to me. my 2 cents -gerel
