> > Gerel, what do you think about this? We would of course loose the
> > benefits of the opaque pointers in this case, but 'pdf_obj_equal_p'
> > throwing PDF_ENOMEM sounds quite weird, and I think that we could
make an
> > exception and publish the iterator structure.
> >
>
> BTW An alternative would be to allocate an iterator along with the
> list, and still have the structures hidden from the public. What
> you think ?
>
> Hm, a pre-allocated iterator... but then we would need to update the
> module interface to allow the client to get a reference to it, right?
>
Jemarch, I'm confused now :-), let's restate the issue or let it die.
:''D
I had a quite intensive working "day" (including a large part of the
last night) and my poor limited brain is more damaged than usual.
Can you explain your suggestion, but this time for dummies? :)
--
Jose E. Marchesi <jema...@gnu.org>
http://www.jemarch.net
GNU Project http://www.gnu.org
