>> Should we maybe disable `no-check' from now on? If it doesn't even >> compile, it doesn't make much sense to have it there, I would say. Or >> maybe we can hack it so that at least it ignores fixtures while compiling... > > OK. Attached is the possible hack/fix for the build-error. This patch will > provide the limited support for the Fixtures and one should be able to build > the code successfully. > NOTE: For future development, I would suggest that test writers will follow > the same procedure as mentioned in this patch, to keep it compatible with > nocheck flag incase one plans to use the fixture. Hope this will help. > >
Great, now at least it will compile with no-check. But now, what happens when running the tests? I guess that check fixtures had some purpose. what happens if the fixture is not enabled?
