The PDF list is a service provided by PDFzone.com | http://www.pdfzone.com
__________________________________________________________________

pdf-digest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb/wrote:

> Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:25:22 -0500
> From: Mitchell Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [PDF] Huge PDF files from quark 6 (on mac)
> 
> The PDF list is a service provided by PDFzone.com | http://www.pdfzone.com
> __________________________________________________________________
> 
> Don't know if anyone mentioned this but I've had Quark files that
> appear to be roughly double the size they should be when distilled.
> The specs for the files are typically; 32 page facing spreads, saved as
> single page postscript file.
> I've found that if a picture box extends even slightly over to the
> opposing facing page, that the image will be included in the postscript
> file twice.
> This is a pain because often a picture box from one page will cross
> over and it looks like the entire image is included in the postscript
> and the distilled pdf.
> 
> - -Mitch Turner

Mitch,

that's strange because
- QuarkXPress, as nearly every professional layout application, does include
only the 'visible' data portion of TIFF images into the PostScript code
- even if this mechanism would fail or EPS image would be used instead of
TIFF images (where this kind of output optimization would fail), Acrobat
Distiller has the capability to analyze which parts of an image are
visible/needed and which not. So at least at the PDF creation stage all
unneeded image information will be removed by Distiller.

So it's possible that the PostScript code is pretty large (especially if
cropped EPS images are used or readers spreads with images spreading from
one page over the over) but the PDF file should be optimized though because
of Distiller's clever coding.

One reason why the PostScript code could be bigger especially on the Mac OS
X platform is the standard encoding used here. By default Mac OS X produces
ASCII85 encoded data which generates roughly 1.3 times as much data as a
binary encoding. I haven't checked this in detail yet but it seems that
QuarkXPress 6.x produces instead of ASCII85 (as Adobe applications do)
ASCIIHex encoded data to fulfill the ASCII clause. This means twice as much
data as binary encoding!

Regards

Robert Zacherl

-- 

*****************************
Robert Zacherl
IMPRESSED GmbH
Tel:++49(0)40/89 71 89-0
Fax:++49(0)40/89 71 89 71
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.impressed.de
*****************************



To change your subscription:
http://www.pdfzone.com/discussions/lists-pdf.html

Reply via email to