The PDF list is a service provided by PDFzone.com | http://www.pdfzone.com __________________________________________________________________
We provide many of our books on CD in pdf form. Not e books as such but just standard pdfs often linked to other data files such as QT, Word, Excel, Flash, PowerPoint etc. My question is what are the disadvantages of distilling Quark legacy docs and now InDesign docs using Distiller 4 as opposed to 5 as opposed to 6. I am not so much concerned with compression/file size issues but am thinking along the lines of accessibility tagging/rtf saving/document structure issues. There may be more that I don't know about and the ones I have just mentioned I don't really have much of a handle on anyway. By using 4 are we missing the chance to embed that kind of data that we may require later. What opportunities are lost with 4 and then 5? Can anything that is not included in a 1.3 file be put back by redistilling the pdf with 6.0 into a 1.5 format file? I am concerned with the future proofing of these files because in some cases we may not have access to the original files. Many thanks Mark To change your subscription: http://www.pdfzone.com/discussions/lists-pdf.html
