I think we should say something specific about Software grants - its
probably implied by the fact that sources have been imported - but IMO
we should spell it out since thats an important achievement in the
due-diligence of bringing in the code base. How about adding the
following paragraph:

Software Grants have been received from Ben Litchfield, Daniel Wilson
and Philipp Koch who are the primary authors of the PDFBox, FontBox
and JempBox software. There have been a lot of small contributions by
a number of other people to the project and it was asked[1] on the
legal-discuss list whether the primary authors have "sufficient
rights"  to grant a license for all of the code, or if we have to
contact all the other contributors for separate grants. Having
received no response to the question on legal-discuss we assumed that
software grants from the primary authors was sufficient.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/zy6oweihmenqt6o4


Niall

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's again time for our quarterly report. Here's what I was planning
> to submit later today:
>
> <report>
> Apache PDFBox is an open source Java library for working with PDF
> documents. PDFBox entered incubation on February 7th, 2008.
>
> We have finally migrated all sources to Apache svn and set up the
> project website at http://incubator.apache.org/pdfbox/. We also set up
> a CI build using Hudson. Traffic is picking up on the user and
> developer mailing lists, new issues are being reported through Jira,
> and there is initial discussion about an incubating 0.8.0 release.
>
> We're discussing about what to do with the FontBox and JempBox
> codebases that are included as subprojects of PDFBox. We might decide
> to merge them with similar efforts in other Apache projects, most
> notably XML Graphics.
>
> Issues before graduation:
>
>  * Increase community size and activity
>  * License review
>  * Export control notifications
>  * First Apache release
> </report>
>
> As usual, comments and improvements are welcome.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>

Reply via email to