I haven't and this is good news if the pdf to image conversion has improved in PDFBox. I would rather use PDFBox, which I need extensively for other things, than using yet another library.
Navendu Garg On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Daniel Wilson <williamstonconsult...@gmail.com> wrote: > Have you tried the latest PDFBox code? It is much improved in the rendering > area since the 0.7.3 release. In fact, several more improvements were made > over the weekend ... one of them improving speed and the others improving > correctness. > > Merging PDFBox with PDFRenderer would present a huge technical challenge ... > and the LGPL license doesn't mix very well (I suspect) with the Apache > license. > > Daniel Wilson > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Navendu Garg <garg.nave...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It is a known issue that PDFBox pdf to image conversion is not very >> good at this moment. I had a desperate need to convert pdf page to an >> image. The best freely available library I could come across was >> PDFRenderer (https://pdf-renderer.dev.java.net/), which does a pretty >> good job. I was wondering if some how this library can become a part >> of PDFBox. >> >> One thing I did not like about PDFRenderer library is that it is a bit >> slow. I wonder what it will take to make it more efficient. >> >> Navendu Garg >> >
