[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777228#action_12777228
 ] 

Andreas Lehmkühler commented on PDFBOX-556:
-------------------------------------------

Hmm, if in common cases 70% of the time is spent in writing the text, it seems 
to be obvious that readUntilStream can't be the reason for the performance 
impact of 50%. There were a lot of changes in the TextStripper part since 
0.7.3, so I guess we have to look there for a possible performance loss.

> Performance regression from 0.7.3 to 0.8.0
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PDFBOX-556
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-556
>             Project: PDFBox
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Parsing
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.0-incubator
>            Reporter: Lars Torunski
>         Attachments: screenshot-1.jpg
>
>
> After upgrading from version 0.7.3 to 0.8.0 our pdf indexing for lucene takes 
> a lot longer than expected.
> E.g. a single pdf needs 1150ms to be indexed compared to 750ms with version 
> 0.7.3 ==>  +50%
> My first thought was that more pdfs are indexed or even indexed correctly 
> with 0.8.0. But that shouldn't be an impact more than 50%.
> Profiling with YourKit shows that a lot of time is spent in the method 
> BaseParser.readUntilEndStream and it's invocation of cmpCircularBuffer. Maybe 
> somebody find out how to improve the performance here.
> The method readUntilEndStream handles endobj tags in the stream also which 
> impacts of course the performance, but this is OK.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to