[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777228#action_12777228 ]
Andreas Lehmkühler commented on PDFBOX-556: ------------------------------------------- Hmm, if in common cases 70% of the time is spent in writing the text, it seems to be obvious that readUntilStream can't be the reason for the performance impact of 50%. There were a lot of changes in the TextStripper part since 0.7.3, so I guess we have to look there for a possible performance loss. > Performance regression from 0.7.3 to 0.8.0 > ------------------------------------------ > > Key: PDFBOX-556 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-556 > Project: PDFBox > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Parsing > Affects Versions: 0.8.0-incubator > Reporter: Lars Torunski > Attachments: screenshot-1.jpg > > > After upgrading from version 0.7.3 to 0.8.0 our pdf indexing for lucene takes > a lot longer than expected. > E.g. a single pdf needs 1150ms to be indexed compared to 750ms with version > 0.7.3 ==> +50% > My first thought was that more pdfs are indexed or even indexed correctly > with 0.8.0. But that shouldn't be an impact more than 50%. > Profiling with YourKit shows that a lot of time is spent in the method > BaseParser.readUntilEndStream and it's invocation of cmpCircularBuffer. Maybe > somebody find out how to improve the performance here. > The method readUntilEndStream handles endobj tags in the stream also which > impacts of course the performance, but this is OK. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.