Chris.

You wish is my command:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2148080/SciPDL-v2.016.dmg

Perhaps delete the other versions to avoid confusion?

Karl



> On 6 Jun 2016, at 8:21 AM, Karl Glazebrook <karlglazebr...@mac.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, I think I am persuaded. Just giving the history
> 
> Karl
> 
> 
>> On 6 Jun 2016, at 1:52 AM, Chris Marshall <devel.chm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> AFAICT, we have never had more than one SciPDL per PDL release
>> and the two "styles" of SciPDL have never overlapped.  Is the
>> change from the past implementation to the current implementation
>> information needed to use SciPDL?  If not, we could keep it
>> the same, SciPDL, and also have the benefit of being able to
>> have the SciPDL binary distribution in the same as the PDL
>> source distribution on sf.net.  Seems simpler to me.
>> 
>> --Chris
>> 
>> On 6/4/2016 23:45, Karl Glazebrook wrote:
>>> Opinions on this are welcome!
>>> 
>>> The 2 to 3 thing was because I made a big change to the style of SciPDL... 
>>> (1) including Perl itself and (2) making a draggable DMG rather than a 
>>> packagemaker package. I suppose I could just call it 'newSciPDL' and match 
>>> the version numbers....
>>> 
>>> - Karl
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 4 Jun 2016, at 11:05 PM, Chris Marshall <devel.chm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> <no a mac user but...>
>>>> 
>>>> Am I the only one who finds it confusing that SciPDL, which is
>>>> basically a binary PDL distribution, has a different version
>>>> number?  What about matching the version of the base PDL?
>>>> 
>>>> </no a mac user but...>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 6/4/2016 00:39, Karl Glazebrook wrote:
>>>>> Done!
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2148080/SciPDL-v3.1.dmg
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can someone test? I tried to script it a bit but want an independent 
>>>>> check for screw-ups
>>>>> 
>>>>> Karl
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 28 May 2016, at 7:51 AM, Chris Marshall <devel.chm...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Karl-
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Interested in updating SciPDL for the coming PDL-2.016 release?
>>>>>> Do you have any issues with the current release candidate?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Chris
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>>>>> Subject:    SciPDL 3 for Mac OS X
>>>>>> Date:    Sun, 8 May 2016 13:59:28 -0400
>>>>>> From:    Chris Marshall <devel.chm...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> To:    perldl <pdl-gene...@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Announcing the latest SciPDL 3 with support for PDL-2.015 is now
>>>>>> available at:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   https://sourceforge.net/projects/pdl/files/SciPDL/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks to Karl Glazebrook for this accomplishment.
>>>>>> Enjoy, Mac users all!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --Chris
>> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
> patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
> consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
> J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
> planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
> _______________________________________________
> pdl-devel mailing list
> pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
planning reports. https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
_______________________________________________
pdl-devel mailing list
pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel

Reply via email to