Hi Zaki I attach my latest version of this recipe, the approach I am now taking is to include Perl with this. The delta in going to the next PDL version ought not to be a lot of work. (Basically just rebuild PDL, test and repackage)
- Karl
Building SciPDL with own perl Feb 2016 NOTES.rtf
Description: RTF file
- Karl > On 29 Sep. 2016, at 1:08 am, Zakariyya Mughal <zaki.mug...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 2016-09-28 at 10:34:13 -0400, Chris Marshall wrote: >> Hi Karl- >> >> We're heading for a PDL 2.017 release on 10-Oct-2016. There are many >> bugs fixed and all the warning messages seem to be gone. Will you be >> ready for a new SciPDL release by the 10-11th Oct? > > Hello Chris and Karl, > > Karl, I remember that you mentioned that packaging SciPDL was a lengthy > process that required some manual checking[^scipdl-2.013]. Perhaps this > time you can put together a transcript of the process? > > I have been working on a Perl application that I plan on releasing with > installers for Windows and macOS. This process included creating the > installers automatically as an extension of continuous integration: > continuous delivery. > > I would like to do the same for PDL. > > Cheers, > - Zaki Mughal > > [^scipdl-2.013]: > <https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/mailman/pdl-devel/thread/CAPTtexL5MBbQCWCLsbAwfWi6H8-W2WTEeSRrTvOHsfFEe4Q1jw%40mail.gmail.com/>. > >> >> Thanks, >> Chris >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> pdl-devel mailing list >> pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________ pdl-devel mailing list pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
