That was what I had in mind. Feel like making a PR?

________________________________
From: Jörg Sommrey <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, June 2, 2024 11:18:28 AM
To: Ed . <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] .gitignore strangeness

What about this paragraph as part of the OVERVIEW / WARNING section in
PDL::PP:

     Another problem arises from the number of generated files that may be
     confusing especially when dealing with existing code. Bear in mind that
     the only sources are ".pd" and ".pod" files, while ".pm", ".xs" and ".c"
     files are generated from the ".pd" files and shall not be altered as
     these changes would be overwritten.

Best regards,
-jo


On Sat 01 Jun 2024 10:47:10 PM CEST, "Ed ." <[email protected]> wrote:

> This should probably be added to PDL::PP docs, both where these
> files come from, and a recommendation to ignore the generated ones.
> Jörg, feel like extending your doc-updating? :-)
>
> Best regards,
> Ed
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jörg Sommrey <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2024 9:35:55 PM
> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] .gitignore strangeness
>
> Thanks Ingo and David,
>
> found the source thanks to your hints.  The .gitignore makes sense now!
>
> Best regards,
> -jo
>
> On Fri 31 May 2024 10:24:41 PM CEST, Ingo Schmid via pdl-devel
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jörg,
>>
>> this is  because they are generated from basic.pd, ufunc.pd, etc. See
>> PDL::PP! It is a neat feature to generate code for all data types in
>> both C and Perl level. It is not intuitive for newer folk, though.
>>
>> Ingo
>>
>> On 5/31/2024 9:49 PM, Jörg Sommrey wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> just realized that principal pm files, e.g. Basic/Ufunc/Ufunc.pm are
>>> listed in .gitignore.  What would be the suggested workflow to patch
>>> such files?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> -jo
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pdl-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pdl-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pdl-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel


_______________________________________________
pdl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel

Reply via email to