Craig-

How difficult would it be to have it
work for dataflow piddles that have
their dimensions in the right order?

In that case, the reshape would be
equivalent to a sequence of splitdim()
calls but much less tedious to execute.

It could still die and give a message
if things were hinky.

--Chris

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Craig DeForest <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I “fixed” it by masking it out — attempting to do the thing that tickled
> the bug now throws a meaningful error message instead.
>
> The issue is in the way reshape() is implemented (using setdims()),
> interacting with the way mv() is implemented.  The mv() code pre-caches the
> dimlist offsets for both parent and child, so if some dims disappear from
> the parent or child, then in the next dataflow operation the mv() trans
> code can dereference a pointer to hyperspace.  One way to fix that would be
> to check against ndims() each time — but setdims() and reshape() shouldn’t
> be called on dataflow-linked PDLs anyhow (they’re mostly for doing things
> like slurping in a data file and then formatting it once it is in memory),
> so it made sense (to me) to simply mask out the behavior.
>
> There are some tests to make sure reshape() throws an error in the proper
> condition, and doesn’t in other conditions.
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 14, 2015, at 8:02 PM, Karl Glazebrook <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The reshape() bug was fixed?
> >
> > Is there a test?
> >
> > Karl
> >
> >
> >> On 15 Nov 2015, at 8:18 am, Chris Marshall <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> All-
> >>
> >> ...and should be appearing at a mirror
> >> near you soon.  This release is the first
> >> release candidate for the upcoming
> >> PDL-2.015 release.  It has fixes for the
> >> major problems found in the PDL-2.014
> >> release.
> >>
> >> Please test for your platformsand with
> >> your PDL modules and programs as soon as
> >> possible.  The PDL-2.015 release will be
> >> no later than 01-Dec and by next weekend
> >> if things test well!
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Chris
> >>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
pdl-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

Reply via email to