Happy New Year to you as well.
I haven't tried rperl myself but from what
I can tell, PDL as a C/XS module appears to
be implemented with everything you can't
do with rperl to run fast.
That said, it might be possible to build
and use PDL with rperl to take advantage
of both capabilities. Maybe we should add
"works with rperl" as one of the ideas for
the PDL Next Generation development.
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/6/2016 04:37, Pablo marin-garcia wrote:
Hello, and happy new year,
I was wondering if someone has tested Pdl with rperl. ( rperl stands
for a rapid restricted Perl NOT perl R bindings)
Also I would like to hear some thoughs about the use of rperl or
similar ideas for boosting "scientific perl" usage (together with Pdl
of course ;-))
http://rperl.org/use_rperl.html
--------
https://metacpan.org/pod/RPerl::Learning
*Section 1.8: What Does RPerl Stand For?*
RPerl stands for /"Restricted Perl"/, in that we restrict our use of
Perl to those parts which can be made to run fast. RPerl also stands
for/"Revolutionary Perl"/, in that we hope RPerl's speed will
revolutionize the software development industry, or at least the Perl
community. RPerl might even stand for/"Roadrunner Perl"/, in that it
/runs really fast/.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
pdl-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
