I made a simple module implementing the Discrete Radon Transform using PDL and 
WH Press algorith (below).
I put it at
  https://github.com/wlmb/Radon.git
together with a test program and an image to test it. Hope it is useful.

Regards,
Luis


On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 02:02:49PM -0600, Craig DeForest wrote:
> Cool!
>
> If the PDL high-level implementation isn’t zippy enough, I’d be happy to give 
> some pointers on PP-izing it.
>
> > On Mar 9, 2020, at 1:59 PM, Luis Mochan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Well, I found a nice fast algorithm for a direct and an inverse Radon 
> > (almost)
> > Transform and I think it lends itself for a nice implementation in
> > PDL.
> >
> > Press, William H. “Discrete Radon Transform Has an Exact, Fast Inverse
> > and Generalizes to Operations Other than Sums along Lines.”
> > Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103, no. 51 (December
> > 19, 2006): 19249–54. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609228103.
> >
> > I'll post my solution here if I succeed.
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Luis
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 01:51:01PM -0600, Craig DeForest wrote:
> >> The “fft” option in PDL::Transform::map has to do with interpolation 
> >> method, and isn’t directly relevant (unfortunately).  I used a subset of 
> >> the radon transform in one of my papers (see the appendix; link here:  
> >> https://bit.ly/38Bylg3 <https://bit.ly/38Bylg3>).  That was all 
> >> roll-your-own, though:  I never packaged it up as a full radon transform.
> >>
> >> If I were implementing one in the general case in PDL itself, I’d do 
> >> something like a Fourier transform followed by a PDL::Transform::map to 
> >> radial coordinates followed by an inverse Fourier transform.  PDL::FFTW3 
> >> would be the right tool for that.  There’s probably something in the GSL 
> >> already, though — if so, one could just link to that.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Mar 9, 2020, at 1:39 PM, Boyd Duffee <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hey Luis,
> >>>
> >>> From the deafening silence to your question, I'd say no.  I had a quick 
> >>> look around CPAN and I see nothing for Radon in PDL or Perl in general.
> >>>
> >>> Then I had a look at what a Radon Transform 
> >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radon_transform> actually is and it is 
> >>> **well cool**!   We were talking last week about the episode of House 
> >>> with the bullet fragments and the MRI machine and started asking, how 
> >>> _do_ you get a 3D image from a bunch of attenuations?
> >>>
> >>> As it's not far off the Fourier transform, I'd say it's possible and 
> >>> maybe PDL::Transform's map <https://metacpan.org/pod/PDL::Transform#map1> 
> >>> function with it's { map => 'fft' } option is a place to start hacking.  
> >>> I'll have some free time in a couple of months if you want a willing 
> >>> novice-to-PDL collaborator.  It sounds like something that Perl should 
> >>> have in it's toolbox if we want our language to be serious about 
> >>> Scientific Perl.  I think I've got a "tuit" around here somewhere.  :)
> >>>
> >>> Saludos,
> >>> Boyd
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 4:37 AM Luis Mochan <[email protected] 
> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Is there an implementation of the Radon transform and its inverse in
> >>> PDL? Or some implementation which may be called from PDL?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Luis
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>                                                                  o
> >>> W. Luis Mochán,                      | tel:(52)(777)329-1734     /<(*)
> >>> Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM  | fax:(52)(777)317-5388     `>/   /\
> >>> Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251             |                           (*)/\/  \
> >>> Cuernavaca, Morelos, México          | [email protected] 
> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>   /\_/\__/
> >>> GPG: 791EB9EB, C949 3F81 6D9B 1191 9A16  C2DF 5F0A C52B 791E B9EB
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> pdl-general mailing list
> >>> [email protected] 
> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general 
> >>> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Boyd Duffee
> >>>   Bring on a brand-new renaissance - TTH
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> pdl-general mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
> >>
> >
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> pdl-general mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >                                                                  o
> > W. Luis Mochán,                      | tel:(52)(777)329-1734     /<(*)
> > Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM  | fax:(52)(777)317-5388     `>/   /\
> > Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251             |                           (*)/\/  \
> > Cuernavaca, Morelos, México          | [email protected]   /\_/\__/
> > GPG: 791EB9EB, C949 3F81 6D9B 1191 9A16  C2DF 5F0A C52B 791E B9EB
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pdl-general mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general
> >
>
>

--

                                                                  o
W. Luis Mochán,                      | tel:(52)(777)329-1734     /<(*)
Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM  | fax:(52)(777)317-5388     `>/   /\
Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251             |                           (*)/\/  \
Cuernavaca, Morelos, México          | [email protected]   /\_/\__/
GPG: 791EB9EB, C949 3F81 6D9B 1191 9A16  C2DF 5F0A C52B 791E B9EB


_______________________________________________
pdl-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-general

Reply via email to