If you're not charging at least 100% over "your costs" your giving the
image away.
Ken Waller
----- Original Message -----
From: tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2001 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: Magazine Cover
> "Roberto Burgos S." wrote:
> > Normally, when you are hired for the job, then copyright belongs to
whoever
> > hired you. You can use the picture only for self promotion.
>
> Ah.
>
> I wonder if I should have a contract.
>
> > If you feel confortable charging $400 (plus material expenses of course)
and
> > your client is not gonna be spooked, then do it so.
>
> I was thinking I would just charge a flat rate, and not charge for
> materials specifically.
>
> I have found out that the last photog they hired was paid 300 +
> expenses, and the 'boss' thought that was too much. They actually sent
> one of their non-photog staff people out with a 35mm to get this general
> pic, but of course it came out crappy. Now they're coming up on a
> deadline, and I've got a subject who'll have to sit *again*.
>
> Of course, the $300 figure could be misinformation...
>
> tv
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> visit http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
