At 21:46 12.1.2001 -0600, you wrote:
>When it comes down to it, I'd rather have a camera that takes 35mm film so
>that I don't have to modify it at all. The only problem is finding one.
>Here's my question: the classic camera I'm looking for has to be very
>small and light (my Bantam f4.5 fits easily in my jeans pocket), it has to
>be fully manual (shutter, aperture, focus, film advance), it has to be
>well built (no plastic cheapies), and it has to be reasonably inexpensive
>(say, no more than $100. I'd prefer a folding camera because they're so
>cute, and usually more compact, but I'm open to suggestions. My Bantam
>actually fits the description very well, but it doesn't take 35mm film.
>I wouldn't mind a faster lens, but I can live with a slow one. Thanks!
>chris
Chris, have you thought about some of the folding 35mm
coupled-rangefinders? They are very small. Try a look at
www.cameraquest.com for some of the truly classical ones.
Frantisek
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Visit the PUG at
http://pug.komkon.org.
