Consider this. Every mount I know of, including slide mounts, cuts some off
each edge. I would like a 100% viewfinder - if I get an edge frame on the
viewfinder that corresponds to approximately 1mm off each edge.
... Just my preference.
Regards,
Bob...
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty
is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!
From: "Gianfranco Irlanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Me too, and I found that a K2DMD has pretty most coverage finder of my
> >cameras. Anybody knows the exact figure? I heard 98% somewhere, is that
> >true?
>
> I don't know if it is true, but I have the same feeling. I've done a side
by
> side comparison of the K2, the LX and the Z-1p. Not a rigorous test, but a
> test. The viewfinder of the K2 is the one that comes closer to 100%. The
> finder of the Z-1p, with my regret, shows the worst coverage (<90%??)
among
> the Pentax bodies I own, even the MZ-5n is better...
>
> >Now they do a great think - they increase the length of the paper while
> >having the same heihgt of paper - meaning a 13x18cm (~5x7") print is now
> >13x19.5, a true 2:3 film ratio at same cost... Only one lab does this.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
