Thanks, everyone. This was educational. I think the posters who questioned the figure of 500 lppm are right. I just checked the Feb 01 Pop Photo, which reviewed the new Minolta 24-105. Resolution ranges 34-85. So the rec.photo poster was off by a factor of five. I still like my zooms, though. And my primes. Heck, I like all my lenses. Joe - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
- Re: Primes vs. Zooms: Unusable Sharpness? Peter Spiro
- re: Primes vs. Zooms: Unusable Sharpness? Eric Lawton
- Re: Primes vs. Zooms: Unusable Sharpness? Richard Saunders
- Fw: Primes vs. Zooms: Unusable Sharpness? aimcompute
- Re: Fw: Primes vs. Zooms: Unusable Sharpness? John Francis
- Re: LX repairs and more Mark Cassino
- Re: LX repairs and more David P. Chernicoff
- Re: Fw: Primes vs. Zooms: Unusable Sharpness? SudaMafud
- Re: Fw: Primes vs. Zooms: Unusable Sharpness? aimcompute
- Re: Fw: Primes vs. Zooms: Unusable Sharpness? Gary L. Murphy
- Re: Primes vs. Zooms: Unusable Sharpness? Joseph Tainter
- Re: Primes vs. Zooms: Unusable Sharpness? canislupus
- Re: Primes vs. Zooms: Unusable Sharpness? Shel Belinkoff

