Hi Fred! I have the test - but I do not have scanner of fax at home. They do not say anything very clearly but obviously it is a good lens. Yes, I´m interested. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- Lähettäjä: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Päivä: 31. tammikuuta 2001 1:00 Aihe: Re: Vs: Angenieux 70-210/2.5 [oops] >In a message dated 1/30/2001 12:10:08 PM Eastern Standard Time, >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> Popular Photography December 1985. Is the lens for sale? > >Oops - I ~meant~ to type 70-210/3.5 (f/3.5, and not f/2.5) - <g>. (Doh...) > >Thanks, Raimo, for the tip. I assume, though, that you correctly recognized >my typo, and the review is of an Angenieux 70-210/2.5 lens, right? If so, do >you have the article? Or, if not, how did you find out about it? (One part >of my original question was about how one finds out about older reviews.) > >As for the "for sale" part of your reply: I don't know yet, since I've only >had the lens for a short while so far. (Are you interested in a possible >adoption?) > >Thanks again for the suggestion. > >Fred > - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
