I hereby apologize for my tone, and I apologize to Mafud for tagging his
message specifically.
I'm aware that I can rub people the wrong way sometimes myself, so, on the
glass-house principle, I probably shouldn't be too critical.
I wasn't aware that the PDML had already made a decision to tolerate all
off-topic posts. My mistake.
--Mike
Tom wrote:
> This again?
>
> We had this discussion a while back, just after changing over
> from the pentax.com. The consensus seemed to be that we
> consider this to be a Pentax User's group rather than a Pentax
> Equipment group. That, within reason, we would talk about what
> ever interested the members.
>
> I respect your opinion, Mike, but the totalitarian tone is
> offensive to me. I get enough of the net police on usenet where
> they bitterly will post hundreds of messages complaining about
> one off topic post.
>
> While SudaMafud posts often rub me wrong, I find I have to
> defend his, and others, right to post what he will as long as it
> is not generally offensive. I hope that this will not lead to a
> long thread rehashing this subject, but if it does, it does.
> - --Tom
>
>
> Mike Johnston wrote:
>>
>
>> Sorry, but this is totally inappropriate for the Pentax List. Totally. If
>> you want to discuss politics, please go elsewhere.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org.
