>But the RTSIII has 100% coverage and a relatively high-eyepoint finder, and
>those things aren't unrelated to magnificaton. Generally, eye relief and/or
>higher coverage both make it harder to achieve high magnification, and high
>magnification makes it harder to achieve 100% coverage and/or good eye
>relief.

I understand that 100% viefinder is difficult to design and manufacture. 
However, can't they use larger eyepiece to ovecome the high magnification 
with high-eyepoint? To me anyway, high magnification is important for manual 
focus. Even though I wear glasses, I prefer high magnification than high 
eyepoint. My MX has pretty high magnification and I do not have problem to 
use it.

regards,
Alan Chan

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to