> If these lenses are indeed about to be 'introduced', why would they
>have
>just brought out a lovely 200 macro in traditional FA* (I) garb. Likewise,
>if image stabilization was 'about' to be introduced, why the FA* 200mm
>macro?
I do not know, but could that be USM equivalent lenses?
> Also, re: the new MZ-S camera, if it is not introduced in a 'chrome'
>version, then it still does not really answer the question of the 'limited'
>lenses. And has anyone seen a really good picture of the new flash?
Pentax did indeed show the chrome version (the picture at least) of MZ-S
last year. We do not know if it would be offered. But if not, the only
reason I can think of is that they must think there was not enough market
for one. This is both good and bad. The good news is, I do not need to
choose between them. The bad news is, what to do with my chrome LIMITED (I
reckon I would not sell them just because of the colour though)?
regards,
Alan Chan
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
